Am besten SWR anschreiben und Ubersicht ueber anerkante Studie senden.
Die haben sich sicher eine ausgesucht der schon psychischekrankheit hat.Es gibt auch Menschen mit psychischeerkrankung die Krebs bekommen aber es bedutet nicht das Krebs psychisch ist.
Auch hier ist bekannt das Studie von Eis nicht richtig durchgefuert wurde und sind nicht wisenschaftlich anerkant.
Alle Personen in seine Studie hatten schon eine psychische Ekrankung.
Das konnte man auch die fragen
Uptodate editors.
I want to inform you that I as the editor of the Norwegian
http://www.inneklima.com have published a quite critical review of one of your documents (Black DW, Temple S (2010): Overview of idiopathic environmental intolerance (multiple chemical sensitivity) in
http://www.uptodate.com/online/content/topic.do?topicKey=somato/2302&selectedTitle=1%7E9&source=search_result.
Many consider that your website reflects authoritative medical information, so I was surprised and disappointed to read this article in your website.
I find it correct to translate some of my Norwegian text for your understanding -:
\"Both authors are professors in psychiatry and this article ------- illustrates how experts in one field of medicine may express biased views. ---
In a review like this the reader expects that the authors deal with all arguments relevant to the given field, and comment on arguments under discussion among scientists.
All patients with multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) report symptoms due to some or other chemical exposure. Then, we should believe that psychiatrists principally listen to their patients without blinkers, but in this paper thoughts seem to be absolutely absent about anything other than psychiatric causes. This occurs in spite of a number of newer biochemical reports which seem to support the patients ideas of biochemical mechanisms.
Relevant biochemical research is not referred to at all neither in the verbose text nor in the literature list. Words such as \"biochemistry\", \"biochemical\" and \"capsaicin\" are not found!
Obviously, this article illustrates bias to everyone with scientific experience, and raises doubts about the authority of the authors in question and about the scientific value of your website.\"
(This translation is added to the Norwegian text in
http://www.inneklima.com.
Sincerely yours
Kjell Aas
professor dr. med. emeritus
- Editiert von alena-norge am 21.02.2011, 15:26 -